Saturday, March 31, 2018

From ‘The Footprints of Partition. Narratives of Four Generations of Pakistanis and Indians’ by Anam Zakaria



Karachi ….is referred to as one of the most cosmopolitan and multicultural cities in Pakistan. Unlike Punjab, which is far more homogenous in its identity. Sindh remains home to multiple ethnicities, religions and castes. I can imagine that this was even more so in the early years of Pakistan.

‘You know we Punjabis are very different people, even different from other Indians. There is a cultural sense of not belonging here. You feel at home in Delhi only because there are so many Punjabis here but elsewhere, in UP and other states, you feel out of place. Most Indians are not as flamboyant, they don’t have large gestures or the Punjabi loudness in them. They are subdued, they don’t even share our sense of humor. We believe in taking life by its horns and just enjoying it. We are an irreverent race and perhaps that is another reason why Partition has also become something we don’t take seriously, we push it aside. Our grandparents freed us of that burden, of remembering Punjab as it existed sixty-five years ago……..Punjab has been raided so many times during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries that maybe it has taught us to ignore invasions. Kashmiris, on the other hand, hold on, sticking to their misery…….. That [partition] is a tragedy but in a way I’m also free from that baggage. This is a Punjabi thing, though. It doesn’t exist for other communities, nor for the mohajirs (migrants) in Karachi because they were never fully accepted.’
I ask Alpana to elaborate……….. ‘Well I spent a lot of time with the mohajirs of Karachi ………They were the people who had chosen to move, not because they suffered violence but because that is what they wanted to do. But when they began to suffer in Pakistan, it became their basis of looking back. It was very difficult for them to adjust after expecting something completely different. Of course, they knew that they were better off than they would have ever been in India. They had arrived in a newly-made country that needed to fill a massive number of government posts……..several migrants got jobs at posts higher than what they had in India. They would even brag to their families back in India, those who had chosen to stay behind…….And its true, life was indeed better for them, in the fifties and even the sixties. While their relatives were still stuck in the same place with the same plodding pace of life, often at low posts, the mohajirs had catapulted ahead. But then as the second generation started to grow up, many of them began to regret their parents’ choice of migration. They had started to face the anti-mohajir spirit once the real sons of the soil, the Punjabis, started dominating, garnering power and government jobs due to their sheer numbers and the fact that they were rooted in the soil. The mohajirs had thought they would be the chosen ones but after the initial advantage that they had, they began to get identified with their old country, India. The second generation started to ask. What would have happened had we stayed on the other side? Meanwhile, the first generation had another kind of regret, that Pakistan had never turned out to be as they had imagined.
This was similar to how a lot of the first-generation Indian Muslims regretted their choice of staying back. They idealized Pakistan, wished they could be there. They would clap for Pakistan and support them in all matches and tournaments. What that eventually resulted in was Hindu resentment, an urge to rid India of such Muslims whom they saw as traitors. And on the other hand, back in Karachi, this led to another kind of suffering – that is, regret – which has kept them from moving on, from ridding themselves of the baggage of Partition. That’s the difference between us Punjabis and them. We have let go while they continue to cling on to what happened, what they chose, sixty-five years ago.’ ………Alpana began to interact with more and more locals, in Lahore and Karachi. ‘I began to feel at home……It was then that I began to see the immense similarity in our lifestyles…..the way we speak …..
You know, West Punjab is part of our civilization, our heritage and I can never claim it. That part of my heritage, which defines me, can never be mine again. I can never assert rights on it. It’s the same for the mohajirs in Pakistan. When you cut off a plant from its roots, the flowers begin to grow in different ways. That’s how we are today, each walking aimlessly to find some sense of belonging.’

Several accounts of Partition that I have come across say that it was the riots of Rawalpindi in the March of 1947 that triggered off other events. Ishtiaq Ahmed………writes ………..
‘On March 5, Sikh-Hindu agitators began shouting anti-Pakistan slogans and were challenged by Muslims. Firearms, stabbings and arson were employed by both sides. Initially, the non-Muslims felt they had been successful in driving off Muslims from the streets of Rawalpindi. In the evening of March 6, however, the direction of violence changed from the city to the villages in the district. Suddenly armed Muslims in the thousands began to raid Sikh villages. Neighbouring villages in the Attock and Jhelum districts were also surrounded. In some places the Sikhs fought back, but on the whole the conflict was one-sided…In some places nearly the whole Sikh and Hindu populations were wiped out. However, the deaths included the Sikhs killing their own women and children rather than letting them fall in the hands of Muslim marauders.’

‘……I had read a chapter in my Class 5 Urdu book………The Sikhs would slaughter Muslim children with swords. They used to cut them up into tiny pieces.’…… depicts the picture of Sikhs butchering children with their swords, is a textbook endorsed for Class 5 by the Punjab Textbook Board, which falls under the government of Punjab. These books are studied widely across the province, both in private and public schools…….Tariq Rahman, a renowned professor and researcher, further says: ‘Pakistani textbooks cannot mention Hindus without calling them cunning, scheming, deceptive or something equally insulting.’

No comments: