Pu La Deshpande – the gentle giant of Marathi literature. Maharashtrache Laadke Vyaktimatva

Purshottam Laxman Deshpande (popularly known as Pu La in Marathi colloquial…….) is a beloved litterateur of my home state of Maharashtra. He was a gentle multi-talented author of the comic genre, translator, harmonium-player, film-director, actor, aficionado of music and life in general etc.etc. His wit and command over the Marathi language, his wisdom clothed in humour, his life and the way he lived it is still an inspiration for many. A national treasure, he enriched the life of many and doubtless was an inspiration to many. Am pasting scenes from his very popular one-act play ‘Batatyachi Chaal’ and some other book readings. Being an actor, his book-readings too were extremely popular. The audio cassettes of his book-readings are highly popular to this day, many years after his death.

His apt obituary from The Independent (London) is so well-worded that I need not say more. Am reproducing it fully, below.


Obituary: P. L. Deshpande
Independent, The (London) , Jul 15, 2000 by Adrian Dannatt

BOMBAY'S LEADING poet, playwright and philanthropist might serve as an opening approximation of P. L. Deshpande's place in Marathi culture, but only if it were followed by a string of such qualifications as comedian, singer, musician, raconteur, screenwriter, film director, translator, actor and author of enough books to fill this space with their titles alone.

Deshpande, who died aged 81 in the city of Pune, his longtime base of operations, was known as "Mr Multi-Media Man" and indeed there was almost no area of popular and intellectual culture within Maharashta that he had not dominated for decades. "Pu La" as he was affectionately known by his Marathi initials was as widely popular as a harmonium player as a movie actor, his comic cassettes were continual best-sellers and his unstinting generosity made him a revered supporter of a range of charities.

Deshpande, who had been suffering from Parkinson's for the last six years, died in the hospital he had himself inaugurated; his home became a seething site of mass pilgrimage for several days and, after the Prime Minister of India had sent his condolences from Delhi, Deshpande was to be given a full state funeral, an event wisely resisted by his widow, Sunita, as the antithesis of his aesthetic.

Deshpande was a lifelong socialist resister and radical who, despite his vast fame, never really accepted the status quo. He was amongst the few to resist Indira Gandhi's imposition of emergency and he promoted and translated the dissident literature of that period. More recently the Shiv Sena party government created a special award for him but at their lavish presentation ceremony he strongly condemned the "Fascist tendencies" of Shiv Sena, whose infamous chief Bal Thackeray - a lifelong fan of the writer - derided Deshpande in response.

Deshpande's middle name may have been "Laxman" but he was anything but lax in his ceaseless creative energy which covered every field of entertainment and it would be hard to conjure a figure of equivalent stature in the West. If Deshpande's tape Mhais, a comic account of a bus and a buffalo, still staple entertainment at every middle-class home in Bombay, could cast him as an Indian Woody Allen, his musical repute might mirror Mike Oldfield and his best-selling travelogues suggest the success of Bill Bryson.

As well as his comic travel guides Deshpande's books include genres such as article collections (from some 50 years of journalism), character sketches, lectures and anecdotal recollection, the output of a true "Man of Letters" of the old school. Deshpande's central love was for literature in all its guises and though his oversize reputation is largely limited to the overpopulated state of Maharashtra he was an active force for international cultural exchange.

His plays included versions of Brecht's Threepenny Opera and Shaw's Pygmalion (Tee Phulrani) and one of his most loved works was a Marathi translation of Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea. When he visited London on one of his regular global peregrinations in search of copy he made a special trip to visit Dulwich College to pay homage to the Alma Mater of his favourite writer, P.G. Wodehouse.

Purushottam Laxman Deshpande was born in Bombay and attended Fergusson College, where he set up a literary circle: "We ran it with complete confidence that the future of Marathi literature rested only in our hands." A typically self-mocking comment which can hardly disguise the fact they were proved right. His love of literature was reflected by the series of public readings of Marathi poetry that he set up with his wife and which became sell-out stadium events.

Deshpande seriously studied the harmonium from a young age and eventually became a leading player, as accompanist for some of India's most fabled singers and also composing his own hits, whether the devotional song "Indrayani Kathi" or the children's number "Naach re mora". Indeed his harmonium tapes were a staple at every Marathi home, where few social gatherings would end without some discussion of Pu La and his activities.

Deshpande made his first film, Kuber, in 1947, in which he was acting and play-back singing; by Mothi Manse in 1949 he created the music; and he spent the next decades on countless movies in which he was either actor, play-back singer, composer, narrator or writer. On his last film, Ek Hota Vidooshak (1993), Deshpande created the screenplay and dialogue.

In 1948 his first play, Tuka Mhane Ata, was staged and was his one and only flop, soon followed by years of hits, as appreciated by critics as the common audience. But even Deshpande's plays could not rival the unprecedented popularity of his one-man shows held in theatres and on television, the most spectacularly successful of which was Varya Varchi Varat, a typical satire on middle-class Marathi mores.

Perhaps his signature work was the play Batatyachi Chaal about a ramshackle Bombay apartment building, which is one of the few of his works translated into English.

Deshpande had been sent for television training with the BBC in 1958 and subsequently produced the first television programme broadcast by Delhi Doordarshan the following year. As Maharashta's "Favourite Personality" he won every award and honorary degree in India but no sooner would he receive a monetary prize than he would hand it away. When he received an award from the vocalist Pandit Joshi the audience gave him a spontaneous standing ovation and Deshpande gave all the money to the Asiatic Society of Bombay for the preservation of old books.

Deshpande led a determinedly simple life and pumped his considerable wealth into his own eponymous foundation, whose largesse was unstinting. Its first donation may have been to translate the best Marathi books into braille but the Deshpande Foundation supports everything from a hostel for the children of prostitutes near Pune to a science laboratory at a village school for children displaced by the Koyna earthquake.

All his prizes, medals and decorations are on display in his own museum in that city, the "PL Gaurav Darshan". This also stocks the best-selling videocassette on his life Pu La Vruttant and his pictorial autobiography Chitramay Swagat.

Deshpande had the modesty of all truly popular cultural figures and knew the limits of his appeal:

My writing is primarily parody-based. I was the least bothered about its literary value or its being outdated with the passage of time. I was glad that readers enjoyed my books greatly. The smile on their faces is my acknowledgement. I couldn't ask for more.

Deshpande's personal heroes were Chaplin and Tagore: "the two sides of a coin that is humanism". Deshpande spent three months in Tagore's town, learnt Bengali in order to translate him into Marathi and wished to die with all the grace of Tagore's own words: "Let me say this on this last day what I have seen and what I have received are unparalleled."

Adrian Dannatt

Purushottam Laxman Deshpande, writer, film director, harmonium player, actor and singer: born Bombay 8 November 1919; married; died Pune, India 12 June 2000.



Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part1




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part2




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part3




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part3





Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part4




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part5




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part6



Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part7




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part8





Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part9



Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part10




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part11




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part12




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part13




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part14




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part15




Pu La Deshpande Batatyachi Chal Marathi Natak Part16




Mumbaikar, Punekar ki Nagpurkar




Apurvai




Paliv Prani 001



Paliv Prani 002




Paliv Prani 003





Pu La Deshpande - Majhe Shahari Jeevan 001




Pu La Deshpande - Majhe Shahari Jeevan 002




Pu La Deshpande - Majhe Shahari Jeevan 003




P.L. Deshpande's recording for EMRC and Andha Shradha Nirmulan Samitee






Nakshtranche Dene - Pu La Deshpande Part 2/15

Bollywood Confidential: an article by Suketu Mehta

A very nice article on Bollywood written by Suketu Mehta and videos courtesy youtube


Bollywood Confidential
by Suketu Mehta for the New York Times Sunday Magazine, November 14, 2004

Why do I love Bollywood movies? To an Indian, that's like asking why we love our mothers; we don't have a choice. We were born of them. Though Hindu gods are the obsession, even Muslims genuflect before the screen when they see their heroes walk on. It is significant that, except for Satyajit Ray, there isn't much of an internationally known Indian art cinema; the shadow of Bollywood is too long. Bollywood, and its cousins in the South Indian film industry, have beaten Hollywood at its own game: matching success at the box office with equal success in the battle for the hearts and minds of the audience -- conquering their very dream lives. Kitschy, illogical, often defying common sense, these movies have made me who I am. They shape the way I conduct my love affairs or think about religion or treat my elders.

But it's not just Indians who think this way. The Indian film industry has penetrated into vast, and unlikely, areas of the globe; a hit Hindi movie will be dubbed or subtitled in a dozen foreign languages -- French, Mandarin, Malay. In New York, whenever I get a haircut, I'm confident of getting a discount if the hairdresser is from the former Soviet Union. Indian movies became popular there beginning in the 1950's. The Soviets gave us arms; we gave them our kitsch movies in return. Israelis watch them. Palestinians watch them. Indians and Pakistanis watch them. Dominicans and Haitians watch them. Iraqis watch them. Iranians watch them. In a building full of immigrants in Queens, an Uzbek man once cornered me in a dark stairwell. I'd been mugged before, and I thought, Oh, no. As he towered over me, he started singing, "Ichak dana bichak dana, . . . " a Bollywood standard from the 50's.



All these people watch Bollywood movies because the stories they tell are pre-cynical. Bollywood believes in motherhood, patriotism and true love. Hollywood is too ambivalent about family for their tastes. My friend Abdelkader, a Moroccan writer who grew up in the Netherlands, told me why Moroccans watch Hindi movies: "We like that, in the end, everyone bows down and touches the mother's feet."

The standard Western complaint about Bollywood movies is that they're melodramatic, but for those who love them, melodrama in the defense of entertainment is no vice. Take this explanation from a Dominican cabby in New York, who, along with his 14 siblings, grew up watching Hindi movies. He couldn't remember the title of a single one, but he did remember what he liked about them. "They have singing!" he exclaimed.

Every Bollywood film is a musical, with between 5 and 14 songs. No blockbuster special effects, no interplanetary spaceships, no lone American singlehandedly taking on armies of brown people -- just singing, and respect shown to mothers.

My personal history of Bollywood is entwined with my personal history of Bombay (which I refuse to call Mumbai), where I grew up in the 70's. Bollywood lives in the middle of its created dream: Bombay. There is the Bombay of the auteur Raj Kapoor, where migrants struggle to survive on the city's pitiless sidewalks; the Bombay of gangsters and cops, as in the superstar Amitabh Bachchan's "Deewaar" and "Zanjeer"; the Bombay of the striving middle class; the Bombay of yuppies. Bombay is a city whose contrasts are so extreme that only movies that make no claim to represent reality could do justice to it; a city where those confronted by difficult moral choices -- the loss of life or love -- burst into song.

Going to the movies was a family enterprise in Bombay. The women in my parents' household would pack samosas so we wouldn't have to buy them at the concession stand. This small economy would compensate for the expense of paying scalpers outside the cinemas, often the only way of getting tickets for a hit movie. During the slower songs, as much as a quarter of the audience might get up for refreshments. We were allowed to talk back to the screen, to clap and whistle and jeer, to throw coins in praise when we were particularly pleased.

When I moved to New York in 1977 at the age of 14, I walked around the streets of Jackson Heights singing Hindi movie songs with my friends. In a Hindi movie, emotion is communicated through song, because song is more potent than dialogue. When there's overwhelming emotion -- love, hatred, heartbreak -- spoken words don't suffice. They have to be sung, and the singer has to be transported, on the wings of her song, to the Alpine meadows of Switzerland if she's falling in love (the Swiss Alps are a substitute for troubled Kashmir, the Indian honeymoon paradise) or to a temple in a thunderstorm if her mother is about to die.

We watched the movies every chance we got, in the ramshackle Deluxe Cinema in Woodside, at the Bombay Theater on Queens Boulevard. When the first VCR's started arriving in the late 70's, we gathered with other Indian families, watching three three-hour Bollywood movies back to back, with samosas and tears and laughter. Even the car games we played were based around Bollywood. We played Antakshari, in which one person sang a few lines of a Bollywood song, and the next person had to begin another song with the last syllable of the preceding song. We never risked running out, as we carried so many of these songs within us.

Raj Kapoor gave me the perfect exile's song: "Mera Joota Hai Japani." Raj Kapoor sang it -- or rather, lip-synched it -- to the great playback singer Mukesh, in "Shree 420":
My shoes are Japanese
My pants English
On my head a red Russian cap
Still my heart is Indian.




When I am happy, I sing "Deewana hua Badal" ("The Maddened Clouds") from "Kashmir ki Kali," a song about the coming rains, set to the beat of a horse cart trundling across the Vale of Kashmir.



When I'm sad, I sing "Bicchad Gaye" ("We Have Parted"). When I'm playful, I yell out "Maalish! Tel Maalish!" ("Massage! Oil Massage!") after the comic head masseur in "Pyaasa."



When I want to express friendship, I sing "Yeh Dosti Hum Nahin Todenge" ("This Friendship, We'll Never Abandon"), which all boys growing up in India sang to one another, arms draped fraternally around one another's necks.

(see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OKnzXsoM4U )

We Indians carry these songs around with us. They form our vocabulary of love and grief, from country to country. My aunt's family emigrated to Uganda from India a century ago; she now lives in England and has never been to India, but she listens mostly to Hindi movie songs. When I visited her house in Leicester once, I noticed that none of the children under 5 in her extended family spoke English. They spoke Gujarati and film Hindi; in their house, the TV was on almost all the time, with Hindi movies playing back to back on the VCR. The children, two or three generations removed from India, were living in this simulated Indiaworld.

At college at N.Y.U., I was vice president of the Indian students organization, and we organized regular showings of Hindi movies, driving out to Queens Boulevard to get the giant reels from Eros Entertainment. "Amar Prem" and "Pyaasa" were so popular in the Eisner and Lubin Auditorium that we had to show them twice. As the Indian-American girls watched the love stories and wept, they relaxed their defenses. They reached out for the boy from home. And when we were heartbroken, we turned to the dolorous Mohammed Rafi, or the ghazals -- lyric love songs -- sung by Jagjit & Chitra Singh or by Pankaj Udhas. Not film music, exactly, but close enough; the Urdu poetry expressed in extravagant fashion the torments of the heart: "It feels good to cry against these walls. . . . "

My uncle in Chicago, who has worked for 25 years in a home-furnishings factory, became popular in gatherings of Indians in suburban basements. "Give me the name of any song," he would challenge a hundred people after they had their samosas. "Kabhi Kabhie," they might say, and he would sing the song in its entirety. And they all sang with him -- the doctors, the grocers, the engineers, "Kabhi Kabhie," and their faces became soft and rosy in the singing. "You are truly an encyclopedia of old songs!" they would tell him.



At Indian-American weddings, the women of the family choreograph and perform Bollywood song numbers. Many of the Hindu rituals have merged with scenes drawn from such wedding movies as "Hum Aapke Hain Koun" ("What Am I to You"), essentially an extended wedding video with 14 song sequences. When we want to educate our kids in Indian culture, we take them to the temple -- or to the nearest suburban multiplex showing Bollywood movies. This has spawned a wave of Indian-American hopefuls who return to Bombay every year -- or go for the first time, since many of them were born in America -- to try to become stars. But very few succeed; the local producers take their money and laugh at their American accents and their naivete; in desperation, their doctor or software-magnate fathers finance their children's movies, hoping to launch them in Bollywood.

It was not until graduate school that I became cynical about Bollywood movies. I too began to think that the plots were weak, melodramatic. At the University of Iowa's student-run movie theater, the Bijou, I could see two movies for five dollars, most of them European. I was introduced to Renoir, Fellini, Fassbinder, De Sica. I became, for many years after that, something of a cinephile. When I returned to New York I haunted the repertory theaters -- the Thalia, Film Forum, Anthology Film Archives, and, most of all, the Theater 80 St. Mark's.
The Theater 80 was not a fancy place. It was run by a very old man who owned the prints of all the films he showed, and he showed them over and over again, each film 10 or 20 times a year. This had worn down the prints of the older, more popular films, especially the Bergmans, so that the print skipped, the sound was out of sync for whole scenes and all kinds of dots, flares and blots held wild parties across the screen. Nobody complained. For nowhere else in New York was it possible to see two films for $7, if it was possible to see such films at all: Antonioni, John Ford, Bunuel, Truffaut.

After this wealth of the world's classic art cinema, the Indian movies seemed pointless and absurd to me (except for those of India's own new cinema -- Satyajit Ray, Ritwik Ghatak and, for a while, Mani Kaul). It was only when I moved with my family to Bombay in 1998 that I began to get a sense of why Bollywood was important -- to the country and to me. There was a surge of national pride as our movies regularly made the list of top 10 box-office hits in the United Kingdom and started appearing in Blockbusters across the United States. It became acceptable -- in some parts, even hip -- to be Indian, which was not the case when I came to America in 1977. And I found that the Bollywood movies were, in the Indian context, progressive. They eliminated barriers between Hindus and Muslims and Christians ("Amar Akbar Anthony"); rich boys fell in love with poor girls ("Bobby"); untouchables were brought into patriotic service ("Lagaan," perhaps the first real crossover hit in the West).

The medium fostered new ways of looking at the caste system. And since Hindus and Muslims have always worked together in the determinedly secular Bombay film industry, new if not entirely accurate ways of looking at others, too. Growing up in Bombay with the movies, I had come to understand Muslims as lovable, Christian girls as flirtatious, Sikhs as loyally martial, Parsis as endearingly cracked. The movies trafficked in broad stereotypes, but they were, for the most part, good-natured stereotypes.

In 1998, I returned to Bombay to write a book on the city. I became involved in the writing of a big-budget movie, "Mission Kashmir," and got to know the industry from the inside. I was valued in Bollywood because I had stories. I would roam among the gangsters and the bar girls and bring their stories back to the moviemakers. The gangsters and bar girls would give me their stories because I would tell them how the movie people lived, what they wore, what they ate, whom they slept with (mostly their wives). In Bombay, where people live in compartmentalized bubbles, I became a messenger between worlds.

On one occasion, I went to meet Praveen Nischol, a film producer. He had heard me give a reading at a salon, and he wanted to talk about scripts I could write with him. "It has to be about something ordinary," he told me. "Onion prices. You and I can wonder why onions are so expensive, and then we discover that there's something more sinister behind it." We discussed the world of the beer bars, Bombay's version of geisha bars, which I'd investigated for my book. His last film, "English Babu, Desi Mem" ("English Gentleman, Local Girl"), had a bar dancer as the heroine and starred the superstar Shahrukh Khan. He had Shahrukh committed to doing one more film for him.

Nischol asked about my book, and I described it to him.

"I want to throw a couple of ideas at you," he said. "Let's make you the central character. An investigative journalist."
"Ah." I nodded.
"But more . . . action-packed."
One would hope so.

I met Shahrukh Khan, too. Like Tom Cruise, Khan can singlehandedly guarantee profit for a movie the day he signs on to it. Khan brings his own kinetic energy to his performances. I once watched him rehearse a scene in the film "Duplicate," in which he had to stab the picture of his enemies with a knife, repeatedly, in great anger. As he knifed at the picture, his face glistening with fake sweat, his eyes bloodshot, a lamp in the background burst into flame. The orange plastic filter over it had caught fire. There was not a single fire extinguisher around, and the workers put the lamp out by stamping on it with their feet. I couldn't help thinking of the great classical singer Tansen, who, in medieval times, caused lamps to light spontaneously with the power of his singing "Raga Deepak," "the Raga of Lamps."

(see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u__0X8K7MDs )

But for the most part, as I met the movie people firsthand, they seemed smaller than life. They did their accounts, walked their children to school and worried about their digestion. They worked too hard when away on location to have the multiple affairs that movie magazines like "Stardust" reported in every issue. They spoke English well and Hindi badly. (The great secret of Hindi films is that most of the scripts are written in English; an Urdu dialogue writer usually has to be found to translate the dialogue and give it punch. As the writer Ashis Nandy points out, English has been around in India for 200 years; Hindi for 100 years.) I saw them in their homes, I saw them on the sets. I didn't like the sets. Most of the time, on a movie set, people wait. For a writer, it's like watching grass grow. Shahrukh Khan plays video games in his trailer; the others talk endlessly on their cellphones.

After I returned to America, I met up with some of Bollywood's stars again. A couple of weeks after 9/11, 16 of India's biggest stars got on an American airliner; 4 other passengers got off in fear. Anil Kapoor was reading a copy of Time with Osama bin Laden's picture on the cover; his manager advised him to fold the magazine so that the portrait wouldn't be visible. Aamir Khan reached for an orange and a passenger flinched. They were telling me these stories in the locker room of the Trenton hockey arena, one stop on their road show. They were going to tour 20 cities in 40 days, putting on a vaudeville act for their fans, immigrants from all the countries that love Bollywood. A song, followed by a comedy routine, followed by a re-enacted dramatic sequence from a hit film.

In the hockey arena, Aishwarya Rai, the world's second most beautiful woman according to Roger Ebert, was making herself up in the mirror of a bathroom in the basement, which doubled as her dressing room. We talked into the mirror; she talked to my reflection, I spoke to hers. Then she went onstage and I walked toward the backstage. A chorus girl with a purple ostrich-feather headdress, waiting on the steps for her turn on stage, had the hiccups. With each hiccup, her feathers quivered violently. Then the show began, and I was sitting right below the stage, with the photographers. Aishwarya came out clutching a red pillow embroidered with the words "I love you" and lifted it above her head. Then she saw me and tossed it lightly to me. I held it for half a second; then I heard the mighty, maddened roar. Thousands of screaming fans wanted that pillow, and hands were thrusting out behind me. Without a second thought, I tossed it over my back.

When we lived in Bombay, my son Gautama, then 4, sang "Kuch Kuch Hota Hai" and "Chal Mera Ghoda," in addition to "Barbie Girl" and "Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star."




He was gathering his sources of pleasure from East and West. He was building his own vocabulary of Hindi film music. When he was in New York and missed Bombay, he sang "Kuch Kuch Hota Hai" -- which is loosely based on Archie Comics -- on the sidewalks of the Big Apple. An Indian boy in America, singing a Hindi song from an Indian movie imitation of an American comic book: the Ping-Pong game of kitsch. Along with the Bhagavad-Gita and Thoreau, this, too, has wings.

When we came back from Bombay in 2000, we enrolled Gautama at St. Ann's, a private school in Brooklyn. We were apprehensive about the school; it seemed to be full of rich white kids. How would it take our striving brown ones, with their accents, their utter lack of knowledge of American pop culture?

One parent was making a documentary film of Gautama's first-grade class. The interviewer asked various questions of the children: What's your favorite color? What's your favorite storybook? When he came to Gautama, he asked him, "What's your favorite movie?" "Kuch Kuch Hota Hai," my immigrant son said immediately. The name was flashed in subtitles, below Gautama's smiling face. None of his friends or their parents had any idea what he was talking about. But the elite school got used to it; the next year, for Gautama's second-grade play, his teacher mounted a Bollywood version of "The Ramayana," and my parents had tears in their eyes as they watched 17 mostly white, rich, private-school kids, dressed in sari scraps, dancing to the irresistible beats of songs from the movie "Lagaan" in a school in Brooklyn. Gautama was the golden deer, but Yoni was the wise sage, and Sarah and Sofia were the 10-headed demon Ravana, and Henry was Princess Sita. They were all doing dance moves that were a combination of the classical Bharat Natyam and the decidedly unclassical ones from Bollywood. The 13th-floor dance studio had become a Bombay movie theater. And the immense power of pop culture, the global appeal of Bollywood, had made the unfamiliar . . . family.

Suketu Mehta is the author of ''Maximum City: Bombay Lost and Found.''

Movies ‘R’ Us: #1-2009

1. Shriman Shrimati (Hindi Film) (1982)

This is the kind of cinema that makes me retain faith in Hindi movies and their potential. An ordinary story simply told with excellent actors to boot.

An elderly husband and wife after a trying experience with their daughter, make it their mission to help others in distress. Of the 2 distressed mismatched couples they help over here, one is the rich daughter married of to a lower middle-class jobber, the other a girl from the village married of to a pubber who has slightly more modern expectations from his wife. But alls well that ends well. Finally the ghar ke buddhoo come home.

Fantastic actors here. Sanjeev Kumar and Rakhee Gulzar make a great elderly couple. The 2 sets of younger couples are
Rakesh Roshan/Deepti Naval and
Amol Palekar/Sarika

[Rakesh Roshan is of course the father of the teen sensation Hritik Roshan, Deepti Navan the ever-so-sweet girl next door, Amol Palekar the star of many hit comedies who turned to direction and directed the Shahrukh Khan starrer ‘Paheli’] and Sarika the ex-wife of Kamal Hassan]

The supporting cast includes AK Hangal, Lalita Pawar and Paintal

The only jarring note over here are the two SLAPS delivered to Sarika and Deepti Naval. Its as if to reinforce that nothing but a tight slap can make the woman come to their senses. That display the remnants of a male chauvinist culture. But other than that there is little else to complain.

Starring

Sanjeev Kumar
Rakhee Gulzar
Rakesh Roshan and Deepti Naval
Amol Palekar and Sarika
Lalita Pawar
AK Hangal
Paintal
Leela Misra
Dr.Shreeram Lagoo
Ramesh Deo

Playback: Lata, Kishore
Story: KS Rao
Dialogue: RajBaldev Raj
Lyrics: Majrooh
Music: Rajesh Roshan
Produced by B.Nagireddy
Directed by Vijaya Reddy


2. Deedar (Hindi movie) (1951)

A tale of unrequited childhood love, …that fails to inspire, fails to rise above the level of childishness, fails to grip and is aided in no small measure to its downfall by the simpering of its main characters…the legends Nargis, Ashok Kumar and Dilip Kumar

And …. Oh, the horrors of laying your eyes on Nimmi’s expressions. And she’s got a slight moustache to boot

The song ‘Bachpan Ke Din Bhula Na Dena’ though, is mellifluous and philosophical



Starring
Nimmi
Yakub
Tun Tun

Written by Azm Bazidpuri
Lyrics: Shakeel Badayuni
Edited by Bimal Roy
Music: Naushad
Direction and Photographic Treatment: Nitin Bose



3. Baaz (1953) (Hindi movie)

The alternate title should have been “Oh! the silliness of it all”

The pic is mostly boring, the uniquess being more in the fact that it deals with the Portugese occupation of Goa and that part of India.

It stars Gita Bali and Gurudutt. The former reminds me of Urmila Matondkar. Those same weird faces, that odd bony skewed stance. Her (Gita Bali’s) mock sword fighting is much better than her acting


Starring
KN Singh
Johny WalkerStory and Screenplay: GuruDutt
Dialogues: LC Bismil and Sarshar Sailani
Lyrics: Majrooh
Costumes designed by Miss Ludvilla Primakoff
Photography: V.K.Murthy
Editor: YG Chawhan
Music: OP Nayyar
Produced by Miss Haridarshan
Directed by GuruDutt

Movie Review: Chori Chori (Stealthily) (Hindi film) (1956)

A mildly interesting story made into a watcheable movie primarily due to the terrific chemistry between the 2 leads: Raj Kapoor and Nargis (that also supposedly flowed on from reel life to real life) and some great songs.

The storyline: a rich heiress on the run from her father (who disapproves of her affair with a ruffian) meets up with a journalist on the way and initial friction gives way to love. I think this was remade into an Aamir Khan-Pooja Bhatt film too.


But now to turn to the songs which are a highlight of the film

You can ignore an initial song featuring the actor Bhagwan. His lady companion’s dance will raise a few chuckles in the modern day and age but she is cute.


Having been patient you will be rewarded with the evergreen ‘Panchi Banoo Udti Phiroo Mast Gagan Main’




The awesome ‘Yeh Raat Bheegi Bheegi Yeh Mast Fizaeen’ is perhaps too intense for the situation the characters find themselves in. But by itself it worth multiple hears. I can watch Raj and Nargis again and again in this song. Their emoting is faultless to my conception.





‘Yeh to batao ke tum mere kaun ho’ is a terrific fun-filled romp where Raj and Nargis get to act as puppets



The great chemistry between both Raj and Nargis is very evident by now. No wonder even the Russians were enamoured. Nargis and Raj Kapoor of course were very popular in the erstwhile USSR



The mellifluous ‘aaja sanam Madhur chandni mein hum’ is captivating





‘Rasik Balma’ is Lata’s voice across the boundless space and across the ages





And yes, there is also a beautiful classical Bharata Natyam piece in between that has no relation to the scenes that precede and those that follow. Its probably an attempt by the South Indians (this movie is produced by them and Bharata Natyam is from the south) to bring culture to the otherwise barbaric north

Starring

Raj Kapoor
Nargis
Bhagwan
Pran (who interestingly appears in the credits after Bhagwan)
David (the genial Jew in a blink-and-miss role)
Johny Walker

Screenplay and Dialogues: Aga Jani Kashmiri
Songs: Hasrat Jaipuri and Shailendra
Music: Shankar Jaikishen
DoP: V.N.Reddy
Produced: L.B.Lachman
Directed: Anant Thakur


Resources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhagwan_Dada

Movie Review: Shakthi The Power (Hindi movie) (2002)

With a name as silly as that, I was prepared for all eventualities.

The movie: it seems is a copy of an English movie. Please……….can we have some originality once in a while.

The story: Karishma Kapoor, the orphaned daughter of a rich restauranteer, is guardianed by Tiku Talsania and ‘Flop Show’ Jaspal Bhatti in blink-and-miss roles; in Canada. In a few more blink-and-miss scenes, she manages to act silly and get engaged to Sanjay Kapoor, act silly then sing a song and get pregnant, act silly some more and have the boy grow up to a kindergarten age for it to be prepared for a bigger disaster on hand.

As an aside the pregnant KK acts not just silly but in a manner which is risky (or is it frisky…….well both) when pregnant. Which brings to mind the Preity Zinta song in Salaam Namaste when she is pregnant but dances and bounces as if she is determined to have if not an aborted foetus, at least a stirred and shaken baby. What do these girls think they are being? Cute? Tchaah!!!

Watch that here




Anyway, The saccharine-sweet Karishma agrees to a marriage, consummates it and delivers a baby in all of the first 15 minutes. That done and out of the way, the story starts. SK’s past which KK never seems to have inquired about, tumbles out of the closet. A news story about a remote Indian villages makes breaking news in their Canadian home……how? Don’t ask. And SK starts behaving alarmingly erratically. Not long after that all 3 depart to the motherland; a village in Rajasthan where SK believes his mother has been affected by the riots.

The village turns out to be a feudal setup with SKs father Nana Patekar a ruthless feudal landowner who indulges in thuggish behavior. In a lawless land, clan rivalries and enmities abound. Its not long after that SK gets killed and KK is at the mercy of Nana and his thuggish ragtag army of bomb-makers. Nana is willing to let go of KK but not his grandson, his only surviving direct descendant. The rest of the film deals with KK’s attempts to deal with a feudal setup and indeed escape from it with her son, and her wits intact. It is a promising storyline but unfortunately all else is downhill thereafter in most other departments of movie-making.

Oh, and by the way it also guest-stars Shahrukh Khan and Aishwarya Rai, the latter only for a song and the former hams his way for a substantial part of the second half to aid KK in her escape.

[v. hammed, ham·ming, hams
v.intr.
To overact.
v.tr.
To exaggerate or overdo (a dramatic role, for example).]


Some other vignettes (do you really expect hidden gems in here?) from the ……and I have to struggle to get the word out………movie.


Throughout the movie, you have to deal with Karishma, the pocket-sized dynamo of over-acting, the mistress of the above-the-top school of acting. Her role is a scream, literally. She screams her way through the movie in the hope of finally getting a scene right.

Her acting is….well, so shallow and urbanish, devoid of empathy (not through design but through inexperience). Her stock expressions seem to revolve around hysteria and hysterical reactions. Her defiance is too well manicured to seem sincere.



The placement of almost all the songs seems to have been done by a novice or an incredibly insensitive fellow. It is so discordant as to be ugly. 2 examples will suffice

1. A gruesome ‘clan vengeance killing’ is followed by a frisky song featuring Prabhu dancing an urban dance amidst pots and hundreds of extras. The setting is a traditional/conservative Rajasthani/Marwari clan based community (seemingly, incredibly displaying some Bihari/Uttar Pradeshi accents) with women the chattel of men, and we have an item girl displaying her ample midriff and dancing with Prabhudeva. WTF?? This is like a restaurant (this is the key word!) Punjabi meal, full of oil and lots of spice, giving 12 hours of rumbling stomach, burning ass and indigestion afterwords. Phew!! There I have got it out of my system

2. The song ‘Ishq Kamina’ is quite catchy. Shahrukh Khan gets to display his charisma and Aishwarya Rai (Mrs Funny Faces) her lack of it. But the placement of the song is distressing. It starts after a particularly gut-wrenching emotional scene where Karishma is separated from her son. Duh!![Ishq Kameena: Music Annu Malik. Lyrics: Sameer]

Watch it to observe Aishwarya’s lack of soul in dancing. The song, the tune, the choreography is appealing in its own way





The Editing and screenplay continuity i.e. their lack of it make us doubt the sensibilities of the movie maker.


The insensitivity in some of the scenes is intolerable, particularly those involving the child. The way the child is person-handled in the movie is shocking and deplorable……..and all in the name of art and with scarce a thought to the safety of the child. The director, Karishma and Nana should probably be under legal scrutiny for this.




BUT NOT ALL IS LOST.

Its Nana who shines through. As the feudal master with his many hues and shades he dominates every scene he stars in. His roughness, his eccentricities, his small gestures and movements, his camera presence, his identification with the persona………..all appeals. Nana Patekar is the only major character who lends a backbone to the film.

As Nana’s father, stars Chandrakant Gokhale, the veteran of Marathi cinema and father of the famous artiste, Vikram Gokhale. He impresses in a cameo role of grand-dad of Sanjay Kapoor and father of Nana Patekar. As an old man partially paralysed and unable to speak he shows a smooth ease with his craft. (Vikram Gokhale by the way, played the role of Aishwarya’s father in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam and the police inspectors role in the Amitabh starrer Agneepath.)

And Deepti Naval, as Nana’s long suffering but surprisingly well-dressed wife shines in a way good actors shine in filth too.

What Nana and Deepti try to achieve through economy of movement and gesture and a strong empathy with the character, the younger generation: Shahrukh, Karishma and Sanjeev lose it all through lack of subtlety, hamming and over-the-top acting.


And watch out for some super crane camera shots….including those of the smallish feudal fort……wow!!

And some marks to karishma…at least she tries…..though its mostly in the wrong direction


At the end of it, about the best thing that you can say about the movie is that at least it gets over and done with.


Here are some comments I gathered from other online film reviews. Just love them

“Performance wise Karisma screams well. At times you feel like running as far as possible”
“Overall, Sridevi's first production venture is a total confusion”
“A potentially fine picture in search of a much better director”
“Karisma Kapoor, an actress of considerable range, seems constrained to tearful hysteria”
“Megastar Shah Rukh Khan, who appears in second half as a comic alcohol smuggler who helps Nandini escape, seems to have wandered in from another movie.”

Resources
This is a good review of the film (Definition of ‘good’: one that substantially agrees with mine)
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117918950.html?categoryid=31&cs=1&p=0

An interview with Nana
http://www.rediff.com/entertai/1998/jun/29nana.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepti_Naval
Deepti Naval's website
http://www.deeptinaval.com/

Gaan Saraswati - Kishori-tai Amonkar

Kishori Amonkar – Gaan Saraswati (Saraswati of Singing – Saraswati of course being the Hindu Goddess of knowledge, music and the arts) and one off the finest exponents of Indian classical music, alive.

Some consider her voice the voice of divinity. I am transported into bubbles of ecstasy hearing it.

A small sample for your enjoyment




And yes, she did sing for a Hindi film. Open the link to watch ‘Geet Gaya Pattharon Ne’

http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=tLLix-jWPls or
http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=bjMBb3LCoNg

And there was another song for the film Drishti (Sight) which goes ‘Megha Dhire Dhire…..’. couldn’t find it on youtube though


Resources

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kishori_Amonkar
http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=21461
http://www.hinduonnet.com/folio/fo0012/00120100.htm
http://www.hindu.com/2007/08/20/stories/2007082055360300.htm
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=242579
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=128956
http://www.screenindia.com/old/20010921/mcov4.html
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=139726
http://www.hindu.com/fr/2008/02/08/stories/2008020850410100.htm
http://www.chowk.com/interacts/5122
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/musical-nirvana/238168/
http://www.dawn.com/weekly/ayaz/20020920.htm

Your Condom Friend

Guaranteed to bring a smile to your face